Sunday, October 7, 2007

The War on War

If there is one topic I have had enough of, it's the war in Iraq and the subsequent war on the war raging in congress. It makes me want to wrap myself in stories of K-Fed and Britney’s custody battle. Of course, it’s one topic that just can’t be avoided so to follow my blogmates’ suit my first post will also be about Iraq.

It has been pretty well established that the war was a mistake and the Bush Administration cherry-picked the intelligence to bolster support for the war. That is why support for the war was so high during the initial invasion. The reason why public support has dropped so dramatically is because Americans now realize the war was a mistake. Of course now the line is that it is essential to the war on terror. Fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here. I wonder which sect will come over here to fight us the Sunnis or the Shiites?

How anyone can argue that the war in Iraq is essential part of the war on terror is beyond me. The war in Iraq has been a major distraction from the war on terror. That is why according the State Department terrorist attacks have been steadily increasing with a sharp rise last year. We still haven’t caught Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban is back and still fighting in Afghanistan. The war has also weakened our military strength as General George Casey told Congress last week.

Why shouldn’t we set a timetable for pulling out of Iraq? We set timelines for the Iraqis to form a government, form a constitution and to hold elections. By not setting timetables there is not impetuous for a political solution or for the Iraqis to get their military trained. That doesn’t mean pulling out of the region just out of Iraq we can redeploy the troops to other countries in the region as Congressman John Murtha has been calling for the last two years. No one is calling for surrender, besides, we won the war in Iraq a long time ago remember?

3 comments:

yvoss said...

I agree with most of your observations. There are days when I wonder just how come we are spending so much money and so many lives fighting in a country which does not seem to know what to do with freedom or democracy. It is typical 'war fatigue' thinking. Sometimes it seems that Sadam had the key to controlling all the sectarian interests in that country.

I do not agree that our reasons for going to war were "cherry-picked." I'm sure anyone can recall how coy Sadam was about the WMD's. He did not act like someone who had nothing to hide. For all we know, the WMD's have been hidden underground or transported to Syria. I believe Bush had a sincere desire to protect the US from that threat.

Politics and the media have caused a confused blending between the war on terror and the war in Iraq. It didn't start that way, but the shift has been unmistakable. I still maintain that if this country would unite, the war would be over that much sooner.

zalewsd1 said...

I want to address three points on your blog trog.

First, Bush did not "cherry pick" the intelligence. When you make a decision, don't you go through all the pros and cons? Bush made the best decision. There were more "pros" for the war than "cons" to protect the American people and the world.

Next, on your comment on the Sunnis and the Shiites coming to get us. Look, you don't want a dirty bomb going off in your backyard do you? Fighting them on their soil keeps them off ours.

Finally, on the weakened military strength. We are currently fighting two wars in two countries. We are the strongest and greatest country on earth. I think we need to build our military up and make it honorable to serve in the military. We need to but a stop to the liberals who call our troops terrorists (http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=12&num=13611)

zalewsd1 said...

Watch this video and it will show you what hyprocrates are.

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE)